Bracket-fixable running foot for lower limb prosthesis

ABSTRACT

The prosthetic foot ( 1 ) is a lamina of composite material with a characteristic J-shape, fixable by a TT bracket ( 2 ) directly to a socket ( 3 ) containing the stump, i.e. the residual part of the amputated lower limb, in the case of users with transtibial amputations, or to a TF bracket ( 2   a ) itself fixable to a mechanical knee (G) fixable to a socket ( 3   a ), in the case of users with transfemoral amputations. Said socket ( 3  or  3   a ) has a main axis ( 5 ) defined by the loading straight line by which the user, after applying the prosthesis, discharges body weight in the static position, and passing through a point ( 4 ) identifying the femoral epicondyle.

The present invention relates to a foot for a lower limb prosthesiswhich enables a novice user to run while minimizing fatigue, and enablesan expert athlete to improve performance in sports competitions.

A prosthetic foot used for running is different from those used forwalking, as its functionality is different; running feet are also madeof composite material, but always consist of several laminas connectedtogether in such a manner as to perform the functionality of the footand of the ankle joint. A running foot consists of only one lamina, andhence lacks a lamina which morphologically defines the heel, such as inthe human foot: in this respect, this latter lamina is useless forsprinting, i.e. fast running, achieved by bearing on the foot front, andis also useless in a middle-distance race in which the lamina flexesduring loading, as in the case of a spring, in such a manner as toincrease the contact surface and to form a type of virtual heel.

STATE OF THE ART

The object of the present invention is to enable a new user to commencesporting activities while minimizing the energy consumed and hencefatigue, and to enable a sporting athlete to improve performance, byoptimizing the mechanical behaviour of the foot. By analyzing andstudying the running of amputated athletes using commercially availablefeet, it can be noted that during use, in particular during the loadapplication stage, these feet flex by about 30 mm and roll rearwards byabout 5° to generate a force in the opposite direction to theadvancement direction.

This has given rise to the idea of forming a foot which eliminates thenegative component of the force in the advancement direction (Fx) andfacilitates running, by also relating the point of maximum peak force ina vertical direction (Fz) and the point of maximum peak advancementforce (Figure) to the moment of foot contact with the ground, in whichthe femur is perpendicular to the ground line, known as mid-stance, suchthat the user can utilize to a maximum the elastic response generated bythe foot, and lastly, but no less important, can establish a bettermodulus relationship between the vertical force (Fz) and the force inthe advancement direction (Fx), such as to enable a wider stride with aknee trajectory closer to the ground.

The object of the present invention is therefore to provide a runningfoot which during use accurately simulates the functionality of thehuman foot.

This object is attained by a running foot, the inventive characteristicsof which are defined by the accompanying claims.

The invention will be more apparent from the ensuing detaileddescription of one embodiment thereof provided by way of non-limitingexample and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1 and 4 show the foot (1) of the invention in a configurationusing a TT bracket (2), indicated for transtibial user amputation, i.e.below the knee,

FIGS. 2 and 3 show the foot (1) of the invention in a configurationusing a TF bracket (2 a), indicated for transfemoral user amputation,i.e. above the knee,

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the TT bracket (2) for use in fixing thefoot in the case of amputations below the knee, as in FIGS. 1 and 4,

FIG. 6 is a front view of the TT bracket (2) of FIG. 5, FIG. 7 is asection A-A through the TT bracket (2) of FIG. 2, taken on the sectionalplane AA passing through the centre of the frontal plane,

FIGS. 8 to 10 are respectively a front, side and horizontal view of a TFbracket (2 a) for use in fixing the foot (1) in the case of amputationsabove the knee as in FIGS. 2 and 3,

FIG. 11 is a section A-A through the TF bracket (2 a) of FIG. 8, takenon the plane AA passing through the centre of the frontal plane,

FIG. 12 shows the different thicknesses of the foot (1) pertaining toclass IV,

FIGS. 12 a, 13 and 14 show variants of the foot (1) of the inventionrelative to users of different height compared with class IV, asdescribed in detail in FIG. 4, and pertaining respectively to class III,to class II and to class I.

FIG. 15 shows a schematic image of the foot (1) pertaining to class IV,according to the invention, compared with known feet intended for usersof the same class.

These figures show a prosthetic foot (1), defined by a J-shaped laminaof composite material which during use, particularly after the loadingstage, provides an elastic response which enables the user to advanceduring running. This foot (1) can be fixed by a TT bracket (2) directlyto a socket (3) in the case of transtibial amputations, as shown in FIG.1, whereas the foot (1) can be fixed to a TF bracket (2 a) connectableto a mechanical knee (G) in the case of transfemoral amputations, asshown in FIG. 2.

The mechanical knee (G) is connected to a socket (3 a) for subjects withtransfemoral amputations.

In the case of transtibial amputations, the TT bracket (2), the socket(3) and the foot (1) of the invention form a transtibial prosthesis,whereas in the case of transfemoral amputations, the foot (12) of theinvention, the TF bracket (2 a), the mechanical knee (G) and the socket(3 a) form a transfemoral prosthesis.

In both solutions, during the static alignment of the prosthesis, thissocket (3, 3 a) has a main axis (5) passing through a point (4)identifying the femoral epicondyle, real or virtual according to thetype of user amputation, and coinciding with the centre of instantaneousrotation of the user's knee during mid-stance.

In the following description, reference will be made to the prostheticfoot (1) in the specific configuration for transtibial amputatedsubjects, i.e. in the case in which the lower limb has been amputatedbelow the knee. In the case of transfemoral amputated subjects, i.e.above the knee, the foot (1) of the invention is fixed to a TF bracket(2 a) which is connected to the socket (3 a) via a mechanical knee (G)of known type. In this situation, the femoral epicondyle to whichreference is made is virtual and corresponds to the centre of rotationof the mechanical knee during mid-stance, i.e. when the user's femur isperpendicular to the ground.

According to the invention, when the main axis (5) coincides with theloading straight line, during static alignment and during mid-stance, asegment (9) joining a first point (7) of tangency between the foot (1)and the ground line (6) perpendicular to the main axis (5) and a secondpoint (8) of tangency between the foot (1) and a straight line (10)parallel to the main axis, is inclined by an angle α, between 30° and50°, to the ground line (6) perpendicular to the main axis, said point(8) of tangency lying along a line (11) inclined by an angle β, between20° and 40°, to said main axis (5), and intersecting said main axis atthe point (4).

Preferably, the angle α is 40° and the angle β, is 25°.

When the foot (1) is in contact with the ground line (6) perpendicularto the main axis (%), in the configuration used for mounting the footonto the socket (3) or onto the mechanical knee (G) during mid-stance,the first point (7) of tangency represents the 5^(th) metatarsus of ahuman foot, the second point (8) of tangency defining the vertex of thecurve and the virtual heel of the foot (1) according to the invention.

In particular, in this static foot alignment configuration duringmid-stance, the main axis (5) coincides with the loading straight line,the loading straight line meaning that line along which the athletedischarges weight when in the orthostatic position after connecting theprosthesis.

Advantageously, according to the invention, the distance D1 of the firstpoint (7) of tangency from said main axis (5), representative of thedistance between the 5^(th) metatarsus and the loading straight line, isless than the distance D2 of the second point (8) of tangency from saidmain axis (5), representative of the distance between the virtual heeland the loading straight line.

Advantageously, the distance D1 is equal to one half of said distanceD2.

The prosthetic foot has a length Lp, this length being the distancebetween the point (8) representative of the virtual heel and the frontterminal end or tip (17) of the foot along an axis parallel to theground line (6), and is equal to 2×D2±20 mm for all classes.

The foot (1), as shown in FIG. 4, comprises a rectilinear first portion(12) for fixing the TT or TF bracket (2 or 2 a), and inclined to themain axis (5) by an angle θ between 10° and 20°, preferably 15°.

The foot (1) also comprises:

-   -   a curved second portion (13) which defines the morphology of the        virtual heel and consists of an upper portion (13 a) of radius        R2 having its centre of curvature C2 falling on the main axis        (5), and a lower portion (13 b) of radius of curvature R3 having        its centre of curvature at C2;    -   a third portion (14) defining the foot front and consisting of        an upper curved portion (14 a) having its centre of curvature C4        positioned at the same distance from the vertex of the heel (8)        as the ground line (6) and of radius R4, a curved intermediate        portion (14 b) of centre of curvature C5 and radius R5, and a        lower rectilinear portion (14 c) comprising the lower end or tip        (17) of the foot (1) and inclined by an angle μ, between 10° and        20°, preferably 15°, to the ground line (6);    -   a rectilinear fourth portion (15) connecting the curved portion        (13) defining the virtual heel to the portion (14) defining the        foot front, and being inclined by an angle δ between 30° and        50°, preferably 38°, to the ground line (6);    -   a curved fifth portion (16) connecting the rectilinear fixing        portion (12) to the curved portion (13) defining the virtual        heel, and having its centre of curvature at C1 and radius R1.

Some numerical values of those portions forming the foot (1) of theinvention will now be indicated for a category of users, the height ofwhom is between 180 and 190 cm and who take a shoe size between 42 and45. This user category will be indicated hereinafter as class IV.

For users of different height and foot length, these numerical valueswhich characterise the foot (1) must be divided by a conversion or scalefactor related to the ratio between height and length of the human foot.

For example, users of height between 170 and 180 cm and shoe sizebetween 38 and 41 pertain to class III, for whom the foot used willcorrespond to the numerical values of feet used by users of class IVdivided by a factor of 1.1 as indicated in FIG. 12 a.

For users pertaining to class II, of height between 160 and 170 cm andshoe size between 34 and 37, the numerical values of class IV aredivided by a factor of 1.22 as indicated in FIG. 13.

For users pertaining to class I, of height between 150 and 160 cm andshoe size between 30 and 33, the numerical values of class IV aredivided by a factor of 1.366 as indicated in FIG. 14.

The following numerical values apply to users pertaining to class IV, asindicated in FIG. 4:

The radius R1, which generally defines the initial curvature of the foot(1), representative of the human limb of the first portion of theAchilles heel, is equal to 100±2 mm, while C1 is distant from the mainaxis (5) by 150±50 mm and distant from the ground line (6) by 352±100 mmless the thickness of the foot at its point of contact with the ground.

The radius R2, which defines the virtual heel, is equal to 150±50 mmwith its centre of curvature falling on the main axis (5) and a distancefrom the ground line (6) equal to the distance of the heel vertex (8)from the same ground line (6) less the thickness of the foot at itspoint of contact with the ground, i.e. 100±65 mm. The centre C2 of thefoot (1) of the invention is the centre of the virtual ankle during footalignment.

As can be seen in FIG. 15, the centres of curvature C_(H) and C_(K) ofcertain known feet 1 a do not lie on the vertical axis (5) passingthrough the point (4) indicative of the femoral epicondyle, which isreal in the case of transtibial amputations and virtual in the case oftransfemoral amputations.

The radius R3, which defines the lower portion of the virtual heel, isof 130±40 mm with its centre of curvature C3 positioned at about 22±7 mmfrom the loading straight line (5) and 129±22 mm from the vertex (8) ofthe virtual heel, in contrast to known feet in which this centre ofcurvature is to the front of the loading straight line.

The portion 15 joining the virtual heel to the virtual foot front isrectilinear, whereas known feet present curved portions, as shown inFIG. 15.

The virtual foot front (14) is defined by:

-   -   a first portion (14 a) of radius 190±1 mm with centre C4, this        point for all foot classes lying on the perpendicular to the        ground line (6) passing through the point (7) of tangency to the        foot (1) and in the case of class IV lies at 76±22 mm from main        axis (5) and at 226±65 mm from the vertex (8) of the heel,    -   a second portion (14 b) of radius R5 of 150±30 mm with centre C5        at 106±30 mm from main axis (5) and at 150±50 mm from the ground        line (6),    -   a rectilinear third portion (14 c) terminating with the tip (17)        of the foot (1) such that the distance between the point (8) and        the extreme tip (17) of the foot (1) is 316 mm from an axis        parallel to the ground line (6).

Moreover, as shown in FIG. 1, the width of the class IV foot front H orcross-section of the foot (1), examined in detail, according to theinvention is 90±5 mm, i.e. much wider than known feet, such as to ensureequilibrium between the two limbs, i.e. the healthy and the prosthetic,during running. With regard to the other classes the cross-section H is80±5 mm for class III, 70±5 mm for class II and 60±5 mm for class I.

The points C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 and their positions are characteristicof all classes of the foot (1), and together with the radii R1, R2, R3,R4, R5 less the scaling factor defining the numerical values of theindividual class, they completely define the morphology of the foot (1)of all the different classes.

As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, the first rectilinear portion 12 is fixed tothe rear of the socket (3) by a TT bracket (2) in the transtibial case,shown in FIGS. 5 to 7, and is fixed to a TF bracket (2 a) in thetransfemoral case, shown in FIGS. 8 to 10, itself fixed to themechanical knee.

Specifically, the first portion of the foot (1), i.e. rectilinear (12),is fixed to the bracket by fixing elements, for example screws.

For example, the TT bracket (2), which is laminated together with thesocket (3) to ensure suitable strength of the structure, comprises:

-   -   a flat vertical surface (2, 1) to facilitate its positioning on        the socket (3) and hence ensure correct positioning of the foot        (1),    -   a flat surface (2.2), inclined by 15° to the surface (2.1), on        which the foot (1) is positioned and fixed by fixing elements,        for example two screws inserted through two holes (2, 3) present        in it (FIGS. 5, 6 and 7).

As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 in the case of transfemoral amputations, thefirst rectilinear portion (12) of the foot (1) is connected to a TFbracket (2 a) shown in FIGS. 8, 9 and 10, and is connected to amechanical knee (G), connected in its turn to the socket (3 a).

For example, the TF bracket (2 a) has an upper flat surface (2 a.1)presenting for example four through holes (2 a.2) for its fixing byfixing elements, for example screws, to the mechanical knee (G), and arear flat upper surface (2 a.3) inclined at 15° to an axis perpendicularto the upper flat surface (2 a.1); the foot (1) is positioned on the15°-inclined surface (2 a.3) and fixed, for example by two screwsinserted through two holes (2 a.4), as shown in FIGS. 8 to 11.

Advantageously according to the invention, the foot (1) is formed bysuperposing layers of unidirectional carbon/Kevlar fibre fabric andlayers of mutually crossing carbon/Kevlar fibre fabric. Each of theselayers has a longitudinal elastic traction modulus E of about 116,000 isMpa and 58,000 Mpa respectively, and an ultimate tensile strength ofabout 1300 Mpa and 650 Mpa respectively. In particular, the thickness ofthe foot (1) or rather of the composite material lamina increasesstarting from a minimum value at the tip (17) of the final rectilinearportion (14 c) of the foot front (14) to a maximum value at the upperend (18) of the foot (1), as shown in FIG. 4. For example, the foot (1)has eight different thicknesses as shown in FIG. 12: specifically forathletes pertaining to class IV, the lamina has a thickness of 4.5±0.65mm in the initial region starting from the point (17), and extends alongthe foot development for 150 mm, the second region of length 20 mm has athickness of 5.19±0.65 mm, the third region of length 70 mm has athickness of 7.29±0.65 mm, the fourth region of length 20 mm has athickness of 8.25±0.65 mm, the fifth region of length 70 mm has athickness of 9.38±0.65 mm, the sixth region of length 33 mm has athickness of 9.8±0.65 mm, the last two regions are measured from theupper end (18) of the foot (1), at 447 mm from the ground line (6), withthe seventh region having a thickness of 12 mm±0.65 mm and a length of120 mm from an axis parallel to the main axis (5) and the eighth regionhaving a thickness of 10 mm±0.65 mm and a length of 20 mm from an axisparallel to the main axis (5).

For athletes pertaining to the other classes, the thickness in theindividual regions is calculated by dividing by the scaling factor,which is 1.1 in the case of class III, 1.2 in the case of class II and1.366 in the case of class I, as shown in FIGS. 12 a, 13, 14 with atolerance of 0.65 mm. In practice, the foot thickness increases for allclasses from one region to another, starting from the tip (17), where ithas its minimum value, to the upper end (18), where it has its maximumvalue, by a factor for adjacent regions which is between 1.02 and 1.40;the ratio between the foot thickness at the tip (17) and at the upperend (18) is 2.7±0.2 for all classes.

Three sub-classes are provided within each foot class based on theweight of the user, these sub-classes varying in terms of differentthickness: in this respect the strength and the elastic response of thefoot (1) are in relation to the load applied to it, which is a functionof the weight of the user.

A description will now be given of the method for fixing the foot (1) tothe TT bracket (2) and to the socket (3) in the case of transtibialusers and for fixing the foot (1) to the TF bracket (2 a) and to themechanical knee (G) in the case of transfemoral users, and for achievingthe relative static alignment of the foot (1) to the main axis (5),which is done by an orthopaedic technician.

Specifically, the foot (1) is positioned in proximity to the TT bracket(2) and to the socket (3) worn by the user in an orthostatic position,with provisional fixing and positioning.

Based on this initial positioning of the bracket on the socket, the TTbracket (2) is fixed onto the socket (3) with glue.

Advantageously, during static alignment the TT bracket (2) is positionedwith its flat vertical surface (2.1) adhering to the socket (3) andfixed, as already stated, by glue such that the flat surface (2.2) ofthe TT bracket (2) on which the foot (1) is to be fixed will have aninclination of 15° to the main axis (5) passing through the point (4)identifying the real femoral epicondyle. The TT bracket (2) is thenlaminated with the socket such that they become a single structure.

In the case of class IV, which comprises users of height between 180 and190 cm, the foot (1), rigid with the TT bracket (2), once fixed byfixing elements, for example two screws, must be positioned togetherwith the TT bracket (2) on the socket (3), such that the upper end (18)of the foot (1) is at a distance D3 from the ground line (6) of 440±10mm, for example 447 mm and hence at about 100±40 mm from the point (4),and at a distance D4 from the main axis (5) and loading straight line of65±5 mm. The fixing point for the foot (1) has been established such asto enable the functionality of the prosthetic foot (1) to approach thatof the human foot, in which the Achilles tendon, for class IV users,lies at about 100 mm below the centre of the popliteal cavity formed bythe union of the Gastrocnem and Soleum muscles, and is responsible for90% of the foot elasticity.

For the other foot classes, III, II and I, alignment is done in the samemanner, but the distance D3 of the upper end (18) of the foot (1) fromthe ground line (6) and the distance D4 of the upper free end (18) fromthe main axis vary by the scaling factor: D3 becomes equal to 410±20 mm,for example 416 mm for class III, 360±30 mm, for example 365 mm forclass II, and 320±10 mm, for example 322 mm for class I, and D4 becomes59±5 mm for class III, 53±5 mm for class II, and 49±4 mm for class I.

In the case of transfemoral amputations, the foot (1) of the inventionis fixed to the TF bracket (2 a) which itself is fixed to the mechanicalknee (G) by fixing elements, for example four screws.

In this case, the foot (1) is fixed by the following steps:

-   -   fixing the mechanical knee (G) to the socket (3 a) worn by the        user in an orthostatic position,    -   fixing the TF bracket (2 a) to the mechanical knee (G) by fixing        elements, for example four screws,    -   fixing the foot (1) to the TF bracket (2 a) such that, for class        IV users, the upper end (18) of the foot is at a distance D3        from the ground line (6) of 440±10 mm, for example 447 mm and        hence at about 100±40 mm from the point (4), in this case the        virtual femoral epicondyle and centre of rotation of the        mechanical knee being in mid-stance and at a distance D4 from        the main axis (5) and loading straight line of 65±5 mm.

As in the case of transtibial users, for the other foot classes III, IIand I of transfemoral users, the alignment is done in the same manner,but the distance D3 of the upper end (18) of the foot (1) from theground line (6) and the distance D4 of the upper end (18) from the mainaxis vary by the scaling factor: D3 becomes equal to 410±20 mm, forexample 416 mm for class III, 360±30 mm, for example 365 mm for classII, and 320±10 mm, for example 322 mm for class I, and D4 becomes 59±5mm for class III, 53±5 mm for class II, and 49±4 mm for class I.

Consequently the foot (1) of the invention presents a segment (11) witha predetermined inclination between the point (4) and the vertex (8) ofthe virtual heel of 30°±5° to the main axis (5), and a segment (9) withan inclination of 40°±5° between the point of tangency (7) indicative ofthe 5^(th) metatarsus and the vertex (8) of the virtual heel, such as tobest simulate the plantar flexure of the human foot which in the case ofnormal athletes is of 40°.

Advantageously, these effects are best obtained if the first rectilinearportion (12) of the foot (1) is inclined by 15° to the main axis (5).

As can be seen from FIG. 15, these characteristics are not present infeet of known type.

In conclusion, the foot (1) of the invention results in smoother runningbiomechanics, enabling the expert athlete to achieve better performancein sporting competitions, and enabling the beginner to more easilyinitiate a sporting career as the foot (1) of the new inventionminimizes the energy consumed in running and hence the user fatigue.

It therefore provides the following advantages:

-   -   it does not present the negative force component in the        advancement direction (Figure) presented by feet of known type,        which implies greater muscular work for the hip joint by the        user;    -   the horizontal force (Figure) responsible for advancement, which        the foot (1) of the new invention is able to develop after        loading, is increased by 15% over known feet;    -   during contact between the foot (1) and the ground, the moment        in which the horizontal force (Figure) reverses from absorbent        to propulsive, is immediately after mid-stance, i.e. immediately        after the moment in which the femur is perpendicular to the        ground, to enable the user to utilize to a maximum the elastic        response of the foot (1);    -   the vertical force (Fz) is greater by 15% than known feet;    -   during contact between the foot (1) and the ground, the moment        in which the vertical force (Fz) is a maximum is immediately        after mid-stance, to enable the user to utilize to a maximum the        elastic response of the foot (1);    -   the modulus ratio between the vertical force (Fz) and the        horizontal force (Fx) is modified in favour of Fx, such as to        facilitate advancement during running, with a knee trajectory        closer to the ground.

The figures show a number of numerical dimensions, which are to beconsidered as examples only.

1. A prosthetic foot (1) in the form of a composite material lamina witha characteristic J-shape, fixable by a TT bracket (2) directly to asocket (3) containing the stump, i.e. the residual part of the amputatedlower limb, in the case of users with transtibial amputations, orfixable by a TF bracket (2 a) to a mechanical knee (G), itself fixableto a socket (3 a), in the case of users with transfemoral amputations,said socket (3 or 3 a) having a main axis (5) which coincides with theloading straight line during static alignment and during mid-stance,said loading straight line being that along which the user, afterapplying the prosthesis, discharges body weight in the static position,the main axis (5) passing through a point (4) identifying the femoralepicondyle, real in the case of transtibial users and virtual andrepresentative of the centre of rotation of the mechanical knee (G)during mid-stance in the case of trans femoral users, said foot beingcharacterised by comprising: a curved second portion (13) which definesthe morphology of the virtual heel and consists of an upper portion (13a) having its centre of curvature falling on the main axis (5), and alower portion (13 b); a third portion (14) defining the foot front andconsisting of an upper curved portion (14 a) having a centre ofcurvature positioned at the same distance from the ground line (6) asthe centre of curvature of the portion (13 a), a curved intermediateportion (14 b) comprising the lower end or tip (17) of the foot (1) andinclined by an angle μ of between 10° and 20° to the ground line (6); arectilinear fourth portion (15) connecting the curved portion (13)defining the virtual heel to the portion (14) defining the foot front,and being inclined by an angle δ of between 30° and 50° to the groundline (6) and further characterised by having a morphology such that: astraight line (9) joining the point (7), representative of the 5^(th)virtual metatarsus and being a point of tangency between said foot (1)and the ground line (6) perpendicular to the main axis (5), to the point(8), representative of the virtual heel and being a point of tangencybetween the foot (1) and a straight line (10) parallel to the main axis(5), is inclined by an angle α of between 30° and 50° to the ground line(6), and in that the point (8), representative of the virtual heel, liesalong a line inclined by an angle β of between 20° and 40° to said mainaxis (5) and intersects the main axis at a point representative of thereal or virtual femoral epicondyle (4).
 2. The prosthetic foot (1) ofclaim 1, characterised in that said angle α is 40° and said angle β is25°.
 3. The prosthetic foot (1) of claim 1, characterised in that thedistance D1 of the point (7) of tangency, representative of the 5^(th)metatarsus, from said main axis (5), is less than the distance D2 of thepoint (8) of tangency, representative of the 5^(th) virtual metatarsus,from said main axis (5).
 4. The prosthetic foot (1) of claim 1,characterised in that the distance D1 is equal to one half of saiddistance D2.
 5. The prosthetic foot (1) of claim 1, characterised bycomprising a first rectilinear portion (12) inclined to said main axis(5) by an angle _(C) of between 10° and 20°.
 6. The prosthetic foot (1)of claim 5, characterised in that the first rectilinear portion (12) isfixed to the TT bracket (2) or to the TF bracket (2 a), depending on thetype of user amputation, said bracket being itself fixed to the socket(3) in the case of transtibial amputation or to the mechanical knee (G)in the case of transfemoral amputation.
 7. The prosthetic foot (1) claim1, characterised in that said angle _(C) is 15°.
 8. The prosthetic foot(1) of claim 1, characterised in that said angle μ is 15° and said angleδ is 38°.
 9. The prosthetic foot (1) of claim 1, characterised by beingformed by superposing layers of unidirectional carbon/Kevlar fibrefabric and layers of mutually crossing carbon/Kevlar fibre fabric. 10.The prosthetic foot (1) of claim 1, characterised by its thicknessincreasing for all classes from one region to another, starting from thetip (17), where it has its minimum value, to the upper end (18), whereit has its maximum value, by a factor for adjacent regions which isbetween 1.02 and 1.40; while the ratio between the foot thickness at thetip (17) and at the upper end (18) is 2.7±0.2 for all classes.
 11. Theprosthetic foot (1) of claim 1, characterised by being selected fromthree sub-classes within each foot class, based on the weight of theuser, these sub-classes varying in terms of different thickness: in thisrespect the strength and the elastic response of the foot (1) are inrelation to the load applied to it, which is a function of the weight ofthe user.
 12. The prosthetic foot (1) of claim 1, characterised byhaving a length Lp, this length being the distance between the point (8)representative of the virtual heel and the tip (17) of the foot (1)along an axis parallel to the ground line (6), of 2×D2±20 mm, where D2is the shortest distance from the point (8) representative of thevirtual heel and the main axis 5.